Customer Support

JUSTICE EDWARD BOATENG
V.
THE JUDICIAL SECRETARY, THE JUDICIAL SERVICE AND THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL

(2018) JELR 67452 (SC)

Supreme Court 28 Feb 2018 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The case involves the interpretation of articles 146(10)(b) and 155(1) of the Constitution. - The plaintiff argues that his interdiction was unlawful because it was not pursuant to a process of impeachment. - The court determines that the

Case Details

Suit Number:CIVIL APPEAL NO: J6/3/2017
Judges:AKUFFO (MS) CJ (PRESIDING), ATUGUBA JSC, ADINYIRA (MRS) JSC, DOTSE JSC, GBADEGBE JSC, AKOTO-BAMFO (MRS) JSC ,PWAMANG JSC
Counsel:THOMAS HUGHES FOR THE PLAINTIFF,DR. E.I. KORAY (CHIEF STATE ATTORNEY) LED BY WILLIAM POBI (CHIEF STATE ATTORNEY) FOR THE DEFENDANTS

JUDGMENT

GBADEGBE JSC:

We have before us in the exercise of our jurisdiction under article (2) of the Constitution, a reference calling for the interpretation mainly of article 140 (10) (b) of the constitution and a related provision concerning the entitlement of superior court judges to pension in terms of article 155 (1). We wish to note at the outset that although the ruling by which our reference jurisdiction has been invoked specifies in the concluding paragraph only the issue relating to the true meaning of article 146(10) (b) of the constitution there is an implied invitation to us to pronounce on the true meaning of article 155 of the Constitution as well. In our opinion, as the interpretation of provisions of the constitution belongs exclusively to this court, it is important that once we discern from the process by which our jurisdiction under clause 2 of article 130 is invoked that some other provision of the Constitution though not specifically mentioned in the order of refe…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.