Customer Support

KARLETSE-PANIN
V.
NURO

(1978) JELR 69249 (CA)

Court of Appeal 1 Jun 1978 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The case involves two distinct aspects: the fairness of the proceedings in the lower court and the interpretation of section 19(4) of the Courts Act, 1971. - The judge emphasizes the importance of substantial justice and fair equity over

Case Details

Judges:SOWAH JA,KINGSLEY-NYINAH JA,FRANCOIS J.A.
Counsel:KOFI AKAINYAH FOR THE APPELLANT; ADJEI-MENSAH FOR THE RESPONDENT.
Other Citations:[1979] GLR 194

KINGSLEY-NYINAH J.A.: As I read and understand the facts and circumstances clear from the record of proceedings, the material data there provided places before us two distinct aspects for our careful consideration.

To my mind, the dictates of primary justice and fair-play make these relatively more important and far-reaching than the purely technical question of whether “leave” was required of the defendant to appeal, and whether he dutifully complied with the mandatory provisions of section 19 (4) of the Courts Act, 1971 (Act 372), and sought and obtained that statutory permit to take his case beyond the limits of the District Court Grade II Duayaw-Nkwanta.

The first aspect concerns the question whether there was justness, balance and propriety in the proceedings before the Duayaw-Nkwanta District Court Grade II; while the second has to do with the spirit and intendment, the true meaning and effect of section 19 (4) of Act 372 aforesaid, having relevant regard to the facts and circumst…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.