Customer Support

KWAME BEDU-ANDOR
V.
EBENEZER K. BOAHENE & 3ORS

(2023) JELR 112115 (HC)

High Court 27 Apr 2023 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- Applicants (1st and 2nd Defendants) sought dismissal of the instant suit under Order 11 Rule 18(1)(d) of the High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules, CI 47, alleging abuse of court process due to similar suits pending in other courts. - The le

Case Details

Suit Number:E12/100/22
Judges:DR. RICHMOND OSEI-HWERE, J
Counsel:THEODORE NII AYI-BONTE ESQ FOR KWAKU OWUSU-AGYEMANG ESQ FOR THE PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT FELIX ASSAN ESQ FOR JOHN MERCER ESQ FOR THE 1ST, 2ND AND 3RD DEFENDANTS/APPLICANTS.
Location:Accra

RULING

In this application, 1 and 2 Defendants (hereinafter called Applicants) are praying the court to dismiss the suit against them as same is an abuse of the court process.

Order 11 Rule 18 (1) (d) of the High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules, CI 47 provides:

“1) The Court may at any stage of the proceedings order any pleading or anything in any pleading to be struck out on the grounds that (d) it is otherwise an abuse of the process of the Court, and may order the action to be stayed or dismissed or judgment to be entered accordingly.”

The Black’s Law Dictionary 9th edition defines abuse of court process as:

“The improper and tortuous use of a legitimately issued court process to obtain a result that is either unlawful or beyond the process’s scope”

The doctrine of abuse of process, commonly referred to as the rule in Henderson v. Henderson (1843) 3 Hare 100 whose essence was set out by the English Court of Appeal in Barrow v. Bankside Agency Ltd [1996] WLR 257 at 260 as follows:

“Th…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.