This is an action for the recovery of the sum of GH¢54, 560 being the unpaid balance of goods supplied by the Plaintiff to the Defendants. The 2nd Defendant has denied being a party to the sales agreement resulting in this debt. The 1st Defendant also alleged that the last supply of goods made by the Plaintiff were mainly inferior and are still in stock to the knowledge of the Plaintiff.
These are the issues set down for trial:
1. Whether or not the Plaintiff supplied goods worth GH¢ 100,560.00 to the Defendants on credit?
2. Whether or not the parties agreed that Defendant would pay up the cost of the goods on or before the 14th of January, 2014?
3. Whether or not the goods were of inferior quality?
4. Whether or not the Plaintiff is entitled to the reliefs endorsed on the writ of summons?
The facts giving rise to this case are well captured in the evidence -in-chief of the Plaintiff given on 24/02/2015. According to the Plaintiff, he supplied the Defendants with second hand ladies shoes t…