Customer Support

LAYINKA
V.
ATT.-GEN., KWARA STATE

(2004) JELR 54481 (CA)

Court of Appeal 22 Jun 2004 Nigeria
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The appellants, claiming as members of the Galadima family, sought a declaration of customary right of occupancy over land occupied by the 2nd respondent and damages/mesne profits for alleged unauthorized occupation since 1980. - At trial

Case Details

Suit Number:CA/IL/39/2002
Judges:ABOYI JOHN IKONGBEH JCA (Presided) WALTER SAMUEL NKANU ONNOGHEN JCA JA’AFARU MIKA’ILU JCA (Read the Lead Judgment)
Counsel:Prince J. O. Ijaodola - for the Appellants . -*- S. O. Ishola, S.C. - for the 1st Respondent . Akin Akintoye - for the 2nd Respondent .

MIKA’ILU JCA (Delivering the Lead Judgment): In this matter, the appellants are Alhaji Mohammed Layinka Galadima of Ilorin and Alhaji Oluruka - Oba Galadima. They are to be referred to here and after as the 1st and 2nd appellants respectively. The respondents are the Attorney- General of Kwara State and the National Oil and Chemical Marketing Plc.

They are to be referred to here and after as the 1st and 2nd respondents respectively. From the record of proceedings, it is clear that the appellants and one other as plaintiffs, by way of writ of summons instituted an action before the Kwara State High Court of Justice, Ilorin against the respondents jointly and/or severally claiming for the following reliefs:-

A declaration that the plaintiffs’ family’s customary right of occupancy still subsists since the defendants did not obtain the consent and/or permission of the plaintiffs’ family before the 2nd defendant occupied the plaintiffs’ family land on which the 2nd defendant has built her …

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.