JUDGMENT
The circumstances which gave rise to the suit, and this subsequent appeal, are distressing and provoke anxiety that some solution to this fairly prevalent social problem should begin to emerge.
Mr. M, the appellant, had sued R M, the respondent for trespassing upon his property and committing acts of nuisance; during the year 1979. The particulars given were that:
a) on various dates the defendant/respondent, R M brought her children, T O and AM K and their belongings into the plaintiff’s/appellant’s residence, and refused to move out, although requested to do so;
b) on July 26, 1979, the defendant wrongfully seized the plaintiff’s car (registration No [particulars withheld] and 4 airline miscellaneous charges order; keys for motor vehicle No [particulars withheld, personal letters and documents and a land certificate of the plaintiff’s shamba;
c) on February 12, 1980 the defendant insulted and abused guests and relatives of the plaintiff at his residence;
d) on February 16, 198…