Customer Support

MADU
V.
STATE

(2000) JELR 43955 (CA)

Court of Appeal 17 Feb 2000 Nigeria
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The appellant was charged with killing someone and was convicted and sentenced to death by hanging. - The appellant appealed the conviction and raised three issues for consideration: whether the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonab

Case Details

Suit Number:CA/J/139/C/95
Judges:IBRAHIM TANKO MUHAMMAD Justice of The Court of Appeal of Nigeria JOSEPH JEREMIAH UMOREN Justice of The Court of Appeal of Nigeria ISA ABUBAKAR MANGAJI Justice of The Court of Appeal of Nigeria
Counsel:Francis. N. Okafor Esq. For Appellant H. N. C. Mbutarto, D.P.P. Ministry of Justice, Yola, Adamawa State For Respondent
Other Citations:Madu v. State (2001) 3 NWLR (Pt.700)230, (2001) 3 NWLR (Pt. 700) 230

MUHAMMAD, J.C.A. (Delivering the Leading Judgment): The appellant was alleged to have killed one Janyo Kuti sometime in March, 1986. The Appellant was arraigned before the then Gongola State High Court of Justice sitting at Mubi, under section 221 of the Penal Code. The Appellant pleaded not guilty. Eight witnesses were called by the prosecution (Respondent). The Defence (Appellant) called one witness. Learned Counsel for the Defence addressed the Court. No reply was made by the prosecution. The learned trial Judge, after having considered the evidence called by the parties and the address by the Defence found that, the essential ingredients of the offence of culpable homicide punishable with death have 'been proved beyond all reasonable doubt by the prosecution' and found the accused (Appellant) guilty as charged. Learned trial Judge accordingly convicted the Appellant and sentenced him to death by hanging.

Dissatisfied with the trial Court's verdict, the convict appealed to this Co…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.