Customer Support

MAIDARA
V.
HALILU

(2000) JELR 43914 (CA)

Court of Appeal 4 Jul 2000 Nigeria
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The plaintiff sued the defendant for N149,500.00, alleging it was the balance of money collected for the purchase and supply of fertilizer, which the defendant refused to pay despite an agreement. - The defendant counter-claimed, alleging

Case Details

Suit Number:CA/K/38/97
Judges:ISA AYO SALAMI JCA MAHMUD MOHAMMED JCA VICTOR AIMEPOMO OYEYELE OMAGE JCA
Counsel:A. Y. Ladan, Esq., For the Appellant; Respondent unrepresented.

ISA AYO SALAMI, J.C.A. (Delivering the Leading Judgment): The plaintiff's claim against the defendant is for the sum of N149,500.00, being the balance of money collected from him for the purchase and supply of fertilizer, which the defendant refused or neglected to pay, inspite of several demands and an agreement, in which the defendant gave an undertaking to refund the same by 31st December, 1999. The writ of summons was caused to be issued, under undefended list, pursuance of Order 22 rule 1 of the Kaduna State High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules, 1987.

The defendant filed notice of his intention to defend supported by affidavit disclosing defence on the merit. The suit was eventually transferred from the undefended to the general cause list.

Pleadings were consequently ordered, filed and exchanged accordingly a statement of claim and amended statement of defence. The plaintiff's claim adumberated in paragraph 33 of his statement of claim reads inter alia as follows: "In consequence…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.