Customer Support

MAJID SEIDU
V.
THE REPUBLIC

(2024) JELR 111785 (CA)

Court of Appeal 8 Feb 2024 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- Conviction and 40-year sentence for conspiracy to commit robbery and robbery were set aside on appeal; prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as there was no independent evidence linking Appellant to the crime and the

Case Details

Suit Number:SUIT NO: H2/28/2022
Judges:SENYO DZAMEFE (MR.) J. A. (PRESIDING) GIFTY AGYEI ADOO (MRS.) J.A. KWEKU T. ACKAAH-BOAFO (MR.) J.A
Counsel:OWUSU BANA & EMMANUEL OWUSU-BAAH FOR ACCUSED/APPELLANT VIVIAN K. OSEI-TUTU (SSA) FOR THE REPUBLIC/RESPONDENT
Location:Accra

JUDGMENT                 

Ackaah-Boafo, JA

i.          Overview:

[1]   My Lords, Majid Seidu, the Appellant was convicted with others of one count of Conspiracy to Commit Robbery and one count of Robbery; and sentenced to Forty (40) years in prison. Leave for extension of time to appeal was granted by the High Court in November 2021 and the appeal was immediately filed. From the Record of Appeal, I deduce that the trial judge based the convictions on the police Caution Statement of the Appellant, even though the Appellant raised issues with regards to the said statement. My Lords, based on the grounds of appeal filed and the submission of the Appellant, we are asked to consider whether the Prosecution proved the guilt of the Appellant beyond reasonable doubt and whether the trial judge materially misapprehended the evidence relating to the Appellant.

[2] Specifically, the Appellant together with four other accused persons were charged with the offences of Conspiracy to Commit Robbery cont…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.