RULING OF THE COURT
The applicant, MICHAEL MUNGAI, appears in person as he has always done in the previous matters before this Court. That being the case, the Court has granted him some latitude so that he could ventilate his grievances. For example, the application is entitled:-
“This application is brought under section 35 of the Court of Appeal rules Cap 9 and sections 38, 92, 98, 99 and 100 of the civil procedure Act Cap. 21 together with other enabling powers of law and statute.
APPLICATION FOR CORRECTION OF ERRORS, OMMISSIONS AND OTHER MISTAKES IN A COURT OF APPEAL PROCEEDINGS, RULING and ORDERS DATED 17TH JULY, 2009 SO AS TO DETERMINE THE REAL 3 (THREE) APPLICATIONS, COMPLAINTS, ISSUES AND QUESTIONS RAISED BY THE APPLICANT/APPELLANT IN COURT.
NOTICE OF MOTION”
But what does the applicant seek from this Court in this application? We can do no better than reproduce the contents of the application in which the applicant states:-
“Take notice that on the of 2009 at 9:00 o’clock in the m…