Customer Support

MOCOH SA & ANOR
V.
SHIELD ENERGY LTD & ANOR

(2021) JELR 109248 (CA)

Court of Appeal 8 Mar 2021 Nigeria
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The appeal was against a High Court of Lagos State ruling that favored the Respondents, who had not paid for gasoil supplied by the Appellants. - The main issue was whether the lower court correctly declined jurisdiction over the Appellan

Case Details

Suit Number:CA/LAG/CV/207/2020
Judges:Isaiah Olufemi Akeju, JCA Uchechukwu Onyemenam, JCA Mohammed Baba Idris, JCA
Counsel:AZEEZAT OGUNJIMI, Esq., with him, ADEMIDE PETERS, Esq. For the Appellants; ROMEO ESE MICHAEL, Esq. for the 1st Respondent; S. E. MUDJERE, Esq. for the 2nd Respondent.

UCHECHUKWU ONYEMENAM, J.C.A. (Delivering the Leading Judgment): This appeal is against the Ruling of the High Court of Lagos State, holden at Lagos, delivered on 4th February, 2020 wherein the learned trial Judge Per. W. ANIMAHUN J. entered Judgment in favour of the Respondents as follows:

“If the Court persists in enforcing a voidable, a void and illegal contract on the ground that one of the parties has taken a benefit under it, then, the intention of the legislators or forbearance of illegal contract will be perpetually defeated because in almost all of such contracts, benefit would not be a cause of action. This is why I strongly believe that consideration of whether a party has benefited should be limited to a voidable and a void contract and not to an illegal contract. This is so because it will be illogical for the Court to enforce such an illegal contract in a civil suit and convict the culprit in a criminal case. The penalty clause makes such contract unenforceable under any c…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.