Customer Support

MOHAMMED
V.
WAMMAKO & ORS

(2017) JELR 37930 (SC)

Supreme Court 12 Jul 2017 Nigeria
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The appellant challenged the eligibility of the 1st respondent—his party colleague and former House of Representatives member for Kware/Wammako Federal Constituency—on grounds of submitting false information and forged certificates in sup

Case Details

Suit Number:SC.788/2016
Judges:WALTER SAMUEL NKANU ONNOGHEN Justice of The Supreme Court of Nigeria CLARA BATA OGUNBIYI Justice of The Supreme Court of Nigeria KUMAI BAYANG AKA'AHS Justice of The Supreme Court of Nigeria KUDIRAT MOTONMORI OLATOKUNBO KEKERE-EKUN Justice of The Supreme Court of Nigeria CHIMA CENTUS NWEZE Justice of The Supreme Court of Nigeria
Counsel:A.U. Mustapha, Esq. SAN with him, Mustapha B. Tafarki, Esq., Ossy Ehikio, Esq., C. E. Igbokwe, Esq., M. Mohammed, Esq., M.I. Ezeani, Esq., Sulaman Saleh, Esq. and J. A. Atanawhenera For Appellant J. S. Okutepa, Esq. SAN with him, Elizabeth O. Ifedayo, Esq. and Ojonimi S. Apeh, Esq., Mrs. Joy E. Ameloko, Khadijah Danfulani (Miss), Miss Helen John Apeh, Miss Abodia, O. Okutepa, Enejo Godwin Awlu, Esq., Christiana E. Sagay and O.S Achem, Esq. for 1st & 2nd Respondents.Alex Ejesieme, Esq. for the 3rd Respondent For Respondent
Other Citations:(2018) 7 NWLR (Pt. 1619) 573

CHIMA CENTUS NWEZE, JSC (Delivering the Leading Judgment): The appellant and the first respondent, members of the second respondent, APC, are of the same Kware/Wammako Federal Constituency, Sokoto. The first respondent contested and won election to represent the said Constituency at the House of Representatives, between 2011-2015.

At the Court of trial, the appellant entreated it by Originating Summons for declaratory and injunctive reliefs. In sum, his complaint was woven around false declaration as to the acquisition of certificates. Upon a preliminary objection on jurisdiction, the trial Court upheld the objection and struck out the suit for the non-disclosure of reasonable cause of action and for being an abuse of the process of the Court.

The appellant appealed to the Court of Appeal. He, however, did not challenge the rationes decidendi on the question of the absence of reasonable cause of action and the issue of the abuse of the process of the Court. In its judgment, the lower Co…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.