Customer Support

MOSES OSRAH
V.
INTESSAFE INT. VENTURES GH LTD & ANOR.

(2018) JELR 107346 (HC)

High Court 6 Nov 2018 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The court ruled that the second defendant is allowed to act on behalf of the first defendant and can sue and be sued in relation to the activities of the first defendant. - Augustina Oku, who represented the second defendant, is considere

Case Details

Suit Number:BC/458/2015
Judges:NICHOLAS M. C. ABODAKPI
Counsel:SETH AKOTO ESQ. WITH ROBERT SUMAA HOLDING BRIEF FOR G. S. AIDOO ESQ. FOR PLAINTIFF PRESENT COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT - ABSENT

BY COURT: RULING

1. Having heard Counsel for Plaintiff on the relationship that exist between 2nd defendant and the 1st defendant (a legal person), I am of the view that as provided in Section 263 of the Company’s Act 1963 (ACT. 179), the 2nd Defendant is in the class of persons who could act for the 1st Defendant and could sue and be sued in respect of the activities or acts of the 1st Defendant. And therefore Augustina Oku who presented herself as representing the 2nd Defendant is an agent of the Defendants. The Defendants are therefore fixed with knowledge that this case will be called today for the business of fixing a date for mini trial to be conducted or agreed on.

2. This case is adjourned to 15/11/2018 for mini trial to commence.

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.