J U D G M E N T
Per their amended writ of summons of 18th July, 2016, the Plaintiffs’ claim against the Defendant is for the following reliefs: -
(a)Declaration that the 1st Plaintiff had sold and the 2nd Plaintiff had purchased the land the subject-matter in the suit and that the 2nd Defendant is in lawful possession;
(b)Declaration that the 2nd Plaintiff lawfully bought the land in dispute without the slightest knowledge that the 1st Plaintiff had dealings with the Defendant concerning the land
(c) Perpetual injunction; and
(d)Damages for trespass.
In support of the above reliefs the Plaintiffs, in their amended statement of claim of 18th July, 2016, pursuant to leave granted on 15th July, 2016, averred that the 1st Plaintiff, as beneficial owner of the land in dispute, who was in dire financial straights, sold same to the Defendant for Fifty-Two Million Old Cedis (¢52,000,000.00) out of which the Defendant made a part payment of Thirty-Five Million Old Cedis (¢35,000,000.00)…