Customer Support

MUNKAILA
V.
THE REPUBLIC

(1996) JELR 66182 (SC)

Supreme Court 16 Jul 1996 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- Supreme Court dismissed a third-party application to stay proceedings in a constitutional action under article 2(1), holding that only parties to the pending suit may seek such a stay. - Affirmed that the lis alibi pendens doctrine requir

Case Details

Judges:ABBAN CJ JSC, BAMFORD-ADDO JSC, CHARLES HAYFRON-BENJAMIN JSC, KPEGAH JSC, ACQUAH JSC
Counsel:ANYADI FOR THE PLAINTIFF; AVAH CHIEF STATE ATTORNEY FOR THE DEFENDANT.,NANA AKUFO-ADDO (WITH HIM ASIEDU AND SEIDU FAROUK) FOR THE NEW PATRIOTIC PARTY.

ABBAN CJ

In the present application, the applicants are asking the Supreme Court to stay proceedings in writ No 7/96. In the said writ No 7/96 the plaintiff, Brigadier (Rtd) Albert Nii Tehn-Addy, has invoked the original jurisdiction of this court contending that the conduct of the National Electoral Commission (the second defendant in that writ) in refusing to register him (the plaintiff) as a voter is inconsistent with and in contravention of articles 42, 45 and 46 of the Constitution, 1992.

Article 2(1) of the Constitution, 1992 provides that:

“2. (1) A person who alleges that—

...

(b) any act or omission of any person;

is inconsistent with, or is in contravention of a provision of this Constitution, may bring an action in the Supreme Court for a declaration to that effect.”

It is clear that in view of the first relief sought in the plaintiff’s writ No 7/96, the Supreme Court is the proper forum which the plaintiff, Brigadier (Rtd) Albert Nii Tehn-Addy, should resort to, and not the High…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.