Customer Support

NAJAT METAL ENTERPRISES LIMITED.
V.
HANSON AND ANOTHER

(1980) JELR 64196 (HC)

High Court 14 Nov 1980 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The plaintiff-company, Najat Metal Enterprises Ltd., seeks a declaration that it has never been confiscated to the State. - The defendants argue that in September 1979, the Armed Forces Revolutionary Council directed the second defendant

Case Details

Judges:CECILIA KORANTENG-ADDOW J.
Counsel:ALHAJI KWAW-SWANZY FOR THE PLAINTIFF; GLORIA MINTA (MRS.) STATE ATTORNEY FOR THE DEFENDANTS.
Other Citations:[1982-83] GLR 81

KORANTENG-ADDOW J.

The plaintiff-company seeks a declaration that it has never been confiscated to the State. It is not challenging the authority which caused the confiscation, but it is saying that the company which was confiscated to the State is not the same as the plaintiff-company.

It is the defendants’ case that in September, 1979, the Armed Forces Revolutionary Council directed the second defendant, Management Development and Productivity Institute (MDPI), to re-organise the Aschkar and Dakmak group of companies. Pursuant to this directive, the Armed Forces Revolutionary Council by a letter dated 23 September 1979, addressed to the Commissioner of Industries, directed that certain companies including “Najat Company” should become part of the National Industrial Company. Since this is the letter upon which the whole defence turns, it will be necessary to quote the whole letter which reads:

“A.F.R.C /IND/Vol.1
23 September, 1979.
TRANSFER OF FIVE COMPANIES TO NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL CO…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.