Customer Support

NANA ADUNA II AND MRS. PHILOMENA SAM
V.
THEODORA YEABOAH, KENNETH OTOO-QUAYSON AND MABEL SEMUA COFFIE

(2018) JELR 65534 (CA)

Court of Appeal 8 Feb 2018 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The main issue in this appeal is whether non-compliance with certain rules before issuing a probation action renders the proceedings a nullity or a mere irregularity. - The respondents issued a writ of summons against the appellants in th

Case Details

Suit Number:NO: H1/126/2017
Judges:KUSI-APPIAH J.A. (PRESIDING), DZAMEFE J.A., SUURBAAREH J.A.
Counsel:MR. DAVID VANDYKE FOR 1ST & 2ND DEFENDANTS/APPELLANTS,MR. THOMAS AUBYN FOR 1ST & 2ND PLAINTIFFS/RESPONDENTS

JUDGMENT

KUSI-APPIAH, J.A.

The main issue that arises for determination in this appeal is whether non-compliance with Order 66 Rules 33(3) and 37(1) of C.I.47 before probation action is issued out, is a mere irregularity which can be set aside or renders the proceedings a nullity. Put differently, was the plaintiffs’ action competent or properly before the trial court?

The facts relevant to this appeal were as follows:

On 7th August, 2015, the plaintiffs/respondents (hereinafter called the respondents) issued a writ of summons against the defendants/appellants (hereinafter called the appellants in the High Court, Accra for the following reliefs:

“(1) A declaration that Getrude Otto’s line of inheritance is matrilineal and that the defendants have no business in intermeddling with the intestate estate of the late Getrude Akotaa Otoo.
(2) An order to set aside the grant of the Letters of Administration to the 1st defendant.
(3) An order for the cancellation of the certificate issued to the 1s…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.