JUDGMENT
By a writ of summons filed on 16 November, 2017 Plaintiff commenced action against the Defendant claiming the following reliefs:
a. A declaration that he is the bona fide owner of the 1.19 acres of the land in dispute situate at Shama-Kumasi in the Shama District assembly and same described in the schedule contained in the lease dated 21/12/2012.
b. Recovery of possession of 1.19 acres of the land in dispute situate at Shama-Kumasi in the Shama District Assembly.
c. Perpetual Injunction restraining the Defendant, his agents, assigns, grantees and all who claim through the Defendant from interfering with the Plaintiff peaceful enjoyment of the piece and parcel of land situate and lying at Shama-Kumasi measuring 1.19 acres in the Shama District Assembly.
d. Costs.
Plaintiff’s Case
The plaintiff’s case is reflected in his statement of claim and the witness statement filed on the 16th November, 2017 and 29th July, 2019 respectively.
The crux of Plaintiff’s claim is that he acquired 2…