Customer Support

NANA OTUO ANTWI BOASIAKO
V.
NANA ADJEI PANIN II

(2013) JELR 66368 (SC)

Supreme Court 22 Jan 2013 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The case involves a motion for leave to adduce fresh evidence at the hearing of an appeal, as per Rule 76 of the Supreme Court Rules, 1996 CI 16. - The primary rule is that new evidence may not be introduced in an appeal, but exceptions c

Case Details

Suit Number:CIVIL APPEAL NO. J8/23/2013
Judges:DATE BAH J.S.C. (PRESIDING)
Counsel:KWAKU ASIRIFI FOR THE DEFENDANT/APPELLANT/APPELLANT/APPLICANT,COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS ABSENT. JAMES ENII LATER APPEARS AS COUNSEL.

BY COURT

This is a motion on notice for leave to adduce fresh evidence at the hearing of this appeal, pursuant to Rule 76 of the Supreme Court Rules, 1996 CI 16. From this rule, it is clear that the primary rule is that new evidence may not be adduced in an appeal, before this court. However, there is an exception which allows this Court to permit the adducing of new evidence relevant to the issue before this court in the interest of justice. However, before this Court can allow such new evidence it must be satisfied that with due diligence or enquiry, the evidence could not have been and was not available to the party applying for leave to adduce new evidence.

Accordingly, before I can grant the applicant the leave that he seeks, he has to satisfy me on several counts: First, that the new evidence he seeks to adduce is relevant to the issue or issues before this court.

Secondly, that due diligence or enquiry could not have made available to the applicant the evidence concerned, before o…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.