Customer Support

NII KPOBI TETTEY TSURU III
V.
THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL

(2011) JELR 92177 (SC)

Supreme Court 13 Apr 2011 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The review application pertains to the court's previous decision that article 20(5) and (6) of the 1992 constitution does not apply to the La Wireless Station Land in Accra, which was compulsorily acquired by the State in 1947. - The cour

Case Details

Suit Number:CIVIL MOTION SUIT NO.J7/7/201
Judges:ATUGUBA, JSC. (PRESIDING) AKUFFO (MS), JSC ANSAH, JSC (DISSENTING) ADINYIRA (MRS), JSC OWUSU (MS), JSC (DISSENTING) DOTSE, JSC (DISSENTING) BONNIE, JSC
Counsel:WILLIAM ADDO FOR THE APPLICANT. MRS. SYLVIA ADUSU (CSA) FOR THE RESPONDENT.
Other Citations:(2011) JELR 66490 (SC)

JUDGMENT

ATUGUBA, J.S.C

The main issue raised by this Review application is whether the decision of this court (by 4-1 majority) dated 19/5/2011 that article 20(5) and (6) of the 1992 constitution is inapplicable to the La Wireless Station Land situate, lying and being at Cantonments, Accra, because the said land had been compulsorily acquired by the State in 1947, long before the advent of the said constitution, should be reversed.

The Review jurisdiction of this court is laid down in article 133(l) of the constitution as follows:

“133 Power of the Supreme Court to review its decision

The Supreme Court may review any decision made or given by it on such grounds and subject to such conditions as may be prescribed by Rules if Court.”

Pursuant to this rule 54 of the Supreme Court Rules, 1996 (C.1.16) provides thus:

“54. Grounds for review

The Court may review a decision made or given by it on the ground of exceptional circumstances which have resulted in a miscarriage of justice; or the di…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.