R U L I N G
Plaintiffs obtained judgment against Defendants. After Plaintiffs satisfied all the relevant pre- execution procedural requirements, the Plaintiffs had the judgment executed.
Then Dalex Finance and Leasing Company and Marina Distribution Company Ltd., even though not a party to the suit, applied to the Court to have the judgment set aside on grounds that they had been injuriously or adversely affected by the judgment under the principles laid down in WOLLEY v. NSIAH (2003-2005) 1GLR 69 which followed GBAGO v. OWUSU (1972) 2 GLR 252 and LAMPTEY v. HAMMOND (1987-88) 1GLR 327.
In a ruling of this Court dated 29th March 2017, that application was refused. It is observed that being dissatisfied and aggrieved by the ruling, Dalex Finance and Leasing Company has filed against it Notice of Appeal dated 4th April 2017.
It must be pointed out that the 1st Defendant that was sued by the Plaintiffs as the duly incorporated Company having legal personality capable of being s…