Customer Support

NYAME
V.
KESE ALIAS KONTO

(1999) JELR 67520 (SC)

Supreme Court 10 Feb 1999 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The Supreme Court affirmed that a properly raised and established plea of res judicata—whether by affidavit or oral evidence—bars relitigation of claims or issues already determined by a tribunal of competent jurisdiction, including chief

Case Details

Judges:EDWARD WIREDU JSC, KPEGAH JSC, ADJABENG JSC, ACQUAH JSC, AKUFFO JSC
Counsel:PAAPA DADSON FOR THE APPELLANT; ASARE BEDIAKO FOR THE RESPONDENT

EDWARD WIREDU JSC

This opinion is a concurring contribution to the able and erudite opinion about to be read by my brother Acquah JSC.

The principle of res judicata is now a well established and acceptable principle in judicial proceedings. Its objective is to prevent an abuse of the court’s process by estopping a party to a litigation against whom a court of competent jurisdiction has already determined the issue now being raised by reopening the same subject matter for further litigation. The principle can also be raised against privies of the original parties.

Since its objective is to prevent an abuse of the court’s process there is no need to go into the exercise of hearing the whole evidence on the matter again, otherwise its purpose would be defeated. It can legitimately be determined on an affidavit evidence in appropriate circumstances. Where it is necessary to go into the matter by hearing evidence, such evidence must be restricted to that issue only as a preliminary issue. Pr…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.