Customer Support

OBADZEN II
V.
ONANKA II

(1982) JELR 69268 (CA)

Court of Appeal 11 May 1982 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- This case involves a dispute over the boundary between two Teshie families. - The case originated in the District Court and was transferred to the High Court for trial. - The judge who started the trial could not continue, so another judg

Case Details

Judges:FRANCOIS JA,MENSA BOISON JA,COUSSEY J.A.
Counsel:NATER OLAGA FOR THE RESPONDENT; DR. SETH TWUM FOR THE APPELLANT.
Other Citations:[1982-83] GLR 46

FRANCOIS J.A.

This dispute relates to the common boundary of two Teshie families. It is a contest essentially to determine the true boundary between the quarter lands of the Agbawe and Kle Musum families of Teshie.

The suit originated in the District Court, Accra, and was transferred to the High Court for trial under the provisions of the Courts Decree, 1966 (NLCD 84), para. 49 (2). The judge who commenced the trial could not continue and the suit had to be completed by another judge after the earlier proceedings had been adopted by consent. In the chequered course of the case it was inevitable that something would go wrong. It is not surprising, therefore, that the entire pleadings disappeared from the court docket. Unfortunately it was when the judge came to write his judgment that he discovered this loss. He put it this way:

“Apart from the record of events which took place in the district court and which was transmitted to this court under paragraph 49 (2) of the Courts Decree, 1966…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.