Customer Support

OBOLO
V.
ALUKO & ORS.

(1976) JELR 46275 (SC)

Supreme Court 24 Mar 1976 Nigeria
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The central issue was whether a defendant in a civil case, having been subpoenaed by the plaintiff, is both a competent and compellable witness for the plaintiff. - The trial judge had ruled that while a defendant may be a competent witne

Case Details

Suit Number:SC.234/1975
Judges:DARNLEY A. R.ALEXANDER CJN ATANDA FATAYI-WILLIAMS JSC MOHAMMED BELLO JSC
Counsel:Mr. Owen Fiebai For the Appellant; Mr. J.A. Omakwu & 6th Respondent in person For the Respondent.
Other Citations:OBOLO v. ALUKO & 7 ORS. (1976) 3 S.C. (REPRINT) 113

D.A.R. ALEXANDER, C.J.N. (Delivering the Leading Judgment): The issue in this appeal appears to us to be a simple one. The learned trial judge ruled as follows:-

"In a civil case whilst the plaintiff cannot win his case without calling evidence, the defendant is not obliged to give evidence in which case defendant could still win his case without saying a word. I do not doubt the authorities cited that a party could call his opponent as a witness and provided he is willing he is a competent witness. However there is no law to compel the defendant to give evidence for the plaintiff".

Learned counsel for the appellant cited before us the case of Elias v. Disu and Ors. (1962) 1 All NLR.214, on which he had relied before the trial court, as authority for the proposition that the defendant was not only a competent witness for the plaintiff but also a compellable witness in the circumstances.

Mr. J.A. Omakwu the 6th respondent in this appeal (who is a legal practitioner by profession) annou…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.