J U D GM E N T
Preliminary Comments
This judgment was originally slated for 29th February 2016 but it came to light that the proceedings for 21st July 2015 was missing as part of data that crushed in Land Court 5 in the old complex. Parties were requested to provide copies of their notes to reconstruct the proceedings. 3rd Defendant’s Counsel provided her notes which was accepted as a fair representation of the day’s proceedings with the court notes for that hearing day on the 21stJuly 2015. The case was adjourned for judgment to be delivered on 4th March 2016. In the course of the week precisely the 2nd March 2016, Counsel for Plaintiff sent what appeared to be the transcribed proceedings of the 21st July 2015. I am not sure if the other parties have copies. The Court was informed that Counsel for 3rd Defendant had an emergency but promised to file an address by close of day Monday 29th February but this was not forth coming. The court did not receive any address from Coun…