Customer Support

OJO
V.
GHARORO

(2006) JELR 56140 (SC)

Supreme Court 10 Mar 2006 Nigeria
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- Miss Felicia Ojo underwent a surgical operation where a broken needle was left in her abdomen, requiring a second operation to partially remove it. - The appellant sued for damages for negligence, but her case was dismissed by the trial c

Case Details

Suit Number:SC.251/2001
Judges:SYLVESTER UMARU ONU JSC (Presided) ALOYSIUS IYORGYER KATSINA-ALU JSC NIKI TOBI JSC (Read the Lead Judgment) GEORGE ADESOLA OGUNTADE JSC IKECHI FRANCIS OGBUAGU JSC
Counsel:P. O. Osemwenka Esq. - for the Appellant. G -*- Chief H. O. Ogbodu Esq. - for the Respondents.

TOBI JSC (Delivering the Lead Judgment): This appeal has to do with the management of a patient by medical practitioners. The appellant is that patient. She is Miss Felicia Ojo. I have omitted her middle name.

I hope no harm is done. Although the 1st and 3rd respondents are the medical practitioners involved in this appeal, the 3rd respondent was more in it. The common and market-place name for medical practitioner is doctor. That is the name used in identifying the 1st and 3rd respondents in the proceedings. Doctors are easy to locate or identify in hospital premises. They usually wear lab coats and stethoscopes to match. Patients are their clientele. Let me leave the parenthesis and come to the real matter. It was a surgical operation undertaken by the 3rd respondent, Dr. S. A. Ejide , who at the material time was a senior registrar. The doctors gave professional name to the operation. It is a gynaecological surgical operation. That is a big one. The 1st respondent so calls it and …

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.