Customer Support

OKOH
V.
THE STATE

(1984) JELR 46447 (SC)

Supreme Court 1 Nov 1984 Nigeria
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The appellant's appeal is dismissed as it is devoid of merit. - The original and omnibus ground of appeal was withdrawn and struck out. - The only remaining ground of appeal challenges the affirmation of the conviction and sentence by the

Case Details

Suit Number:SC.42/1984
Judges:ANDREWS OTUTU OBASEKI JSC KAYODE ESO JSC AUGUSTINE NNAMANI JSC BOONYAMIN OLADIRAN KAZEEM JSC CHUKWUDIFU AKUNNE OPUTA JSC
Counsel:Mr. Fola Akinrinsola (with him J. O. Ogunbode) For the Appellant; Mrs. G. O. Olateru-Olagbegi, D.D.P.P., Oyo State) for Respondent.

OBASEKI, J.S.C. (PRESIDING): This appeal is totally devoid of merit and must be dismissed. Learned counsel for the appellant withdrew the original and omnibus ground of appeal and it was struck out. He was left with the ground filed with leave of this Court which reads:

''The Honourable Court of Appeal erred in law and misdirected itself when it affirmed the following passage page 78 thus:

'It was a case of conspiracy to steal and false pretence. There is no merit in the appeal which is accordingly dismissed. The conviction and sentence shall remain.' "

But learned counsel went on to submit that he was not challenging the merit of the case.

In my view, that concession totally destroyed the ground of appeal. Counsel's further concession that he is not supporting the plea of autrefois convict which was raised in the High Court in my view disentitles learned counsel of his right to argue the plea of double jeopardy before us. Section 33(9) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of …

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.