Customer Support

OPPAN
V.
FRANS & CO. LTD.

(1984) JELR 69300 (CA)

Court of Appeal 4 Apr 1984 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- An order staying execution on terms (e.g., conditional payment into court) constitutes a grant, not a refusal, of an application for stay; inconvenience or hardship of the terms does not render the application refused. - Under rule 28 of

Case Details

Judges:ADADE J.S.C,EDUSEI JA,MENSA BOISON J.A.
Counsel:BRIGHT GAISIE FOR THE APPLICANT; DR. TACKIE OTOO FOR THE RESPONDENTS.

ADADE J.S.C.: The only question calling for comment is whether this application is competent. The issue was raised by the court suo motu.

On 6 May 1983 the plaintiff recovered judgment against the defendant in the High Court, Sekondi (Ansah-Twum J.) in the total sum of ¢130,500 (¢125,500 special damages and ¢5,000 general damages) with costs of ¢2,500. Dissatisfied with the judgment the defendant has appealed to the Court of Appeal. Pending the appeal the defendant applied to the High Court for a stay of execution.

The application was ruled upon on 8 December 1983, as follows:

“By Court: Upon the applicant’s application it is hereby ordered that execution shall be stayed on condition that the entire judgment debt and costs in this matter be paid into court within two months from today. If paid the plaintiffs respondents will be entitled to have paid to them the costs awarded. Justice of the High Court.”

Claiming that the conditions imposed by the High Court are onerous and inconvenient th…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.