Customer Support

PAA SOLO COMPANY LIMITED
V.
NAJA DAVID VENEER & PLYWOOD AND ANOTHER

(2019) JELR 64701 (HC)

High Court 21 Jun 2019 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The case revolves around the interpretation and application of Order 1 rule 1(2) and Order 58 rule 3(2) of the High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules, 2004 (CI 47). - The applicant's counsel sought judgment based on admissions made by the def

Case Details

Suit Number:SUIT NO: OCC 33/2017
Judges:HIS LORDSHIP JUSTICE DR. RICHMOND OSEI-HWERE
Counsel:KWAME ADOM APPIAH FOR THE PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT

RULING

Order 1 rule 1(2)of the High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules, 2004 (CI 47) provides:

“These Rules shall be interpreted and applied so as to achieve speedy and effective justice, avoid delays and unnecessary expense and ensure that all matters in dispute between the parties may be completely, effectively and finally determined and multiplicity of proceedings concerning any of such matters avoided.”

Order 58 rule 3 (2) of CI 47 also provides:

“An application for summary judgment or judgment on admissions shall not be filed until after the pre-trial settlement conference.”

In this application for judgment on admission, counsel for the applicant is inviting the court to enter judgment in favour of the applicant based on admissions made by the defendants/respondents in their statement of defence. Counsel acknowledges that the case has not gone through the pre-trial settlement conference which per Order 58 rule 3(2) is a prerequisite to the application. Counsel, however, submits that in the…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.