Customer Support

PAUL MWANGI MURUNGA
V.
REPUBLIC

(2008) JELR 96111 (CA)

Court of Appeal 22 Feb 2008 Kenya
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

Get an AI-generated summary of this case.

Case Details

Suit Number:Criminal Appeal 35 of 2006
Judges:Riaga Samuel Cornelius Omolo, John walter Onyango Otieno
Location:Nakuru
Other Citations:Paul Mwangi Murunga v. Republic[2008] eKLR

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

PAUL MWANGI MURUNGA, “the appellant” hereinafter, appeals to this Court from the judgment of the High Court (Musinga and Kimaru, JJ) which judgment the two learned Judges chose to head “JUDGMENT OF THE COURT”, probably copying that heading from the judgments of this Court, but without appreciating the reason or reasons why the Court styles its single unanimous judgments as “Judgment of the Court”. Each and every judge of this Court is normally entitled to write his or her own judgment and where all the judges of the Court are agreed on a decision they normally write a single judgment which then becomes the “Judgment of the Court”. In criminal appeals heard by two judges of the High Court we doubt, and we have never come across a situation, where each judge has written his or her own judgment. Indeed, if the two judges disagree on the outcome of such an appeal, there would be no judgment at all and the appeal would have to be reheard afresh before a different bench…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.