Customer Support

PDP
V.
INEC & ORS

(2012) JELR 34749 (SC)

Supreme Court 17 Feb 2012 Nigeria
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

Get an AI-generated summary of this case.

Case Details

Suit Number:SC.6/2012
Judges:MAHMUD MOHAMMED JSC CHRISTOPHER MITCHELL CHUKWUMA-ENEH JSC MUHAMMAD SAIFULLAHI MUNTAKA-COOMASSIE JSC JOHN AFOLABI FABIYI JSC BODE RHODES-VIVOUR JSC
Counsel:Chief Wole Olanipekun, SAN with K. Kalejaiye, SAN, Dele Adesina, SAN, Yahaya Mahmoud, SAN, Ayo Adesina Esq. and K. Chukwu Azie Esq.; P.C. Okafor-Okezuonu with Adul-Majid Oniyangi Esq., Aina Abdul, M. Salahudeen, Adetunji Muvan Esq., Chief Mrs. V. O. Awomolo, Ayo Oguleye Balogun, Chidi Amaeze, A. O. Gwa (Mrs.) and Wale Balogun for the 1st Respondent; Yusuf Ali, SAN with A. O. Adelodun, SAN, Dr. W. O. Egbewole, Ayo Olanrawole, Muhammad Sani Katu, K. K. Eleja, Bello Umar, Y.D.U. Hambali, Adam O. Olori-Aji, S. A. Abdullah, Issa Abubakar and A. N. Raji for the 2nd - 4th Respondents; P.C. Okafor-Okezuonu with Adul-Majid Oniyangi Esq., Aina Abdul, M. Salahudeen, Adetunji Muvan Esq., Chief Mrs. V. O. Awomolo, Ayo Oguleye Balogun, Chidi Amaeze, A. O. Gwa (Mrs.) and Wale Balogun for the 1st Respondent; Yusuf Ali, SAN with A. O. Adelodun, SAN, Dr. W. O. Egbewole, Ayo Olanrawole, Muhammad Sani Katu, K. K. Eleja, Bello Umar, Y.D.U. Hambali, Adam O. Olori-Aji, S. A. Abdullah, Issa Abubakar and A. N. Raji for the 2nd - 4th Respondents.

M. S. MUNTAKA-COOMASSIE, J.S.C.: (Delivering the Leading Judgment): The appellant challenged the return of the 2nd and 3rd respondents as the duly elected Governor and Deputy Governor respectively of Zamfara State in the gubernatorial election conducted on 26/4/2011. The respondents filed their respective replies to the petition in which they encompassed their objections to the Petition.

The trial Tribunal ordered that the objection would be heard together with the substantive petition. The petition was heard on its own merit after which the parties filed their respective written addresses. The respondents argued the objections in their written addresses while the appellant also replied. The trial Tribunal in its judgment up held the objection and struck out paragraphs 12, 17, 18, 19, 22, 27, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 36, 37, 41, 42, 43 and 44 of the petition.

In all, the trial Tribunal held that the petitioner has failed to prove the allegations in its petition and same was dismissed.

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.