Customer Support

PETER MUTHOKA & ANOTHER
V.
OCHIENG & 3 OTHERS

(2019) JELR 95415 (CA)

Court of Appeal 21 Jun 2019 Kenya
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The dispute centered on the appropriate basis for calculating instruction fees on an advocate–client bill of costs under the Advocates Remuneration Order (ARO) where the underlying suit had been settled, rather than decided by judgment or

Case Details

Suit Number:Civil Appeal 328 of 2017
Judges:Milton Stephen Asike Makhandia, James Otieno Odek, Patrick Omwenga Kiage
Location:Nairobi
Other Citations:Peter Muthoka & another v. Ochieng & 3 others [2019] eKLR

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

This appeal turns on the narrow question of how a Taxing Master ought to determine for purposes of instruction fees, the value of the subject matter for purposes of an advocate - client bill of costs where a suit has been settled between the parties.

The appellants herein Peter Muthoka (Muthoka) and Joseph Mumo Kivai (Kivai) (the clients), had previously retained the law firm of Ochieng, Onyango, Kibet and Ohaga Advocates (the advocates), to represent them in various matters particularly to defend them in High Court Civil Suit No. 503 of 2011, CMC HOLDINGS LIMITED and CMC MOTORS LIMITED -vs- ANDY FORWARDING SERVICES LIMITED and 2 OTHERS, a suit wherein the plaintiffs sought, inter alia, a declaration that the clients and others had breached their fiduciary duties to the said plaintiffs thereby occasioning them losses amounting to Kshs.1,563,000,000, which they claimed plus interest.

That suit was compromised in terms of a Settlement Deed dated 8th February, which wa…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.