Customer Support

PROF. AGYEMAN BADU AKORSAH & 3 ORS
V.
MINISTER FOR JUSTICE & ATTORNEY-GENERAL & 2 ORS

(2017) JELR 64726 (HC)

High Court 15 Mar 2017 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The Plaintiffs seek to join the Millennium Development Authority (MiDA) to the present suit. - The Defendants oppose the application. - The Plaintiffs claim that joining MiDA to the suit will make the court's decisions binding on MiDA and

Case Details

Suit Number:SUIT NO. HR/0008/2015
Judges:ANTHONY K. YEBOAH JUSTICE OF THE HIGH COURT
Counsel:BRIGHT AKWEETEY ESQ. FOR THE PLAINTIFFS/APPLICANTS, SELINA KOFFIE (MS.) FOR GRACE OPPONG (MRS) (PRINCIPAL STATE ATTORNEY) FOR THE 1ST & 2ND DEFENDANTS/RESPONDENTS, MAME ESAAMA ORLEANS-LINDSAY (MS.) FOR TONY LITHUR ESQ. FOR 3RD DEFENDANTS/RESPONDENTS.

RULING

YEBOAH J.

The Plaintiffs/Applicants seek to join the Millennium Development Authority (MiDA) to the present suit with the filing of this application on 20th June 2016. The Defendants/Respondents vehemently oppose the application.

At paragraph 10 of the Affidavit in Support of the application, the Plaintiffs per their solicitor deposed “[t]hat the object of this application is to join MiDA to this suit as a 4th Defendant so that decisions of this Court would be binding on MiDA as well and to avoid a multiplicity of suit.” This, indeed, is the thrust of the present application. Accordingly, I discount the lame attempt by learned counsel for the Plaintiffs in his written submissions to give the alleged ignorance of the legal status of MiDA as the main reason for their non-joinder of MiDA to the suit from the outset.

In fact, at paragraph 10 of the Statement of Claim, the Plaintiffs pleaded that the Government of the Republic of Ghana (GOG) appointed MiDA to lead the privatization proc…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.