Customer Support

REDLAND ROSES LIMITED
V.
HIRIBO MOHAMMED FUKISHA

(2015) JELR 94072 (CA)

Court of Appeal 30 Jan 2015 Kenya
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The appellant is appealing against the award of compensation to the respondent under the Workmen's Compensation Act. - The respondent filed a suit claiming compensation for bodily injuries sustained due to exposure to hazardous chemicals

Case Details

Suit Number:Civil Appeal 84 of 2011
Judges:Erastus Mwaniki Githinji, Daniel Kiio Musinga, Jamila Mohammed
Location:Nairobi
Other Citations:Redland Roses Limited v. Hiribo Mohammed Fukisha [2015] eKLR

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

The appellant being aggrieved by the judgment and decree of the High Court, appeals against the award to the respondent of Kshs. 806,280/- being compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Kshs. 5000/- as special damages and costs.

The respondent filed a suit against the appellant claiming special damages, general damages and loss of future earning as a result of serious bodily injuries he sustained due to exposure to hazardous chemicals. He pleaded, inter alia, that he was employed as a chemical sprayer in the appellant’s rose flower farm at Ruiru in Thika from 16th June 1996; that he was exposed to hazardous chemicals in the process of spraying fields of roses; that he sustained serious bodily injuries – namely, chemical hepatitis due to hydrocarbon; chemical dermatitis and chemical pneumonitis and that the injuries were occasioned to him by reason of the negligence and breach of contract by the appellant. The particulars of negligence pleaded against the …

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.