Customer Support

REPUBLIC
V.
BAYFORD

(1973) JELR 63634 (HC)

High Court 26 Jun 1973 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The accused is charged with two counts of dishonestly receiving stolen property. - The defence argues that there is no evidence to prove the accused's guilt. - The accused is the manager of a company and only personally buys or receives g

Case Details

Judges:CHARLES CRABBE J.
Counsel:I. AHLIJAH SENIOR STATE ATTORNEY FOR THE REPUBLIC; R. S. BLAY WITH HIM POLLEY FOR THE ACCUSED.
Other Citations:[1973] 2 GLR 421

CHARLES CRABBE J.: The accused is charged on two counts of dishonestly receiving, on the first count 860 brass nuts and on the second count 23 water meters.

At the end of the case for the prosecution, counsel for the accused submitted that no prima facie case had been made against the accused. The accused was charged under section 146 of the Criminal Code, 1960 (Act 29), which is a straight forward case of dishonestly receiving stolen property knowing it to have been stolen or knowing it to have been dishonestly appropriated. According to Archbold, Criminal Pleading, Evidence and Practice (36th ed.), there are certain ingredients to be proved. The first is that if it is stealing, then the theft must be proved. If it is dishonestly appropriated, that must be proved. Having proved that, the prosecution must go further and prove that the accused did receive the goods that were misappropriated in any of the following manners: that is, with guilty intent, knowing or should have known or oug…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.