Customer Support

THE REPUBLIC
V.
HIGH COURT, ACCRA EX-PARTE; ATTORNEY GENERAL

(2012) JELR 67406 (SC)

Supreme Court 4 Jul 2012 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- Certiorari is a discretionary remedy that may be refused where the applicant has an adequate alternative remedy or acquiesced in the impugned proceedings, even in cases of alleged lack of jurisdiction. - The Supreme Court dismissed the At

Case Details

Suit Number:CIVIL APPEAL NO. J5/16/2012
Judges:DR. DATE-BAH JSC (PRESIDING), ANSAH JSC, YEBOAH JSC, GBADEGBE JSC, BAMFO (MRS) JSC
Counsel:KWAME AMOAKO (ASA) LED BY ANTHONY REXFORD WIREDU (PSA), ASIAMAH SAMPONG (PSA) JOHN TULASI OFORI (ASA) OWUSU AMEYAW (ASA) FOR THE REPUBLIC; AYIKOI OTOO WITH FRANK DAVIS AND ATTA AKYEA FOR THE INTERESTED PARTY.

JUDGMENT

DR DATE-BAH JSC:

This is the unanimous ruling of the Court. The remedy of certiorari has always been a discretionary one. The authors of De Smith, Woolf and Jowell’s Principles of Judicial Review (1999), in discussing the historical development of judicial review remedies and procedures, make the following pronouncement (at p. 530) in relation to the four prerogative writs of certiorari, mandamus, prohibition, and habeas corpus:

“Though the four writs had acquired their “prerogative” characteristics by the middle of the seventeenth century, strangely it was not until a century later, in 1759, that anybody (Mansfield) seems to have thought of classifying the writs as a group. Those shared characteristics included the following:
1) They were not writs of course which could be purchased by or on behalf of any applicant from the Royal Chancery; they could not be had for the asking, but proper cause had to be shown to the satisfaction of the court why they should issue.
2) The award of…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.