Customer Support

REPUBLIC
V.
KWADWO II

(1991) JELR 69370 (CA)

Court of Appeal 17 Jan 1991 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The Court of Appeal held that the collection of stool land revenues from Fahiakobo by the respondent (Omanhene of Bekwai), rather than by the Administrator of Stool Lands as mandated under section 48 of P.N.D.C.L. 42, was unlawful and not

Case Details

Judges:AMPIAH JA, OFORI-BOATENG JA, ADJABENG JJ.A.
Counsel:SAM BADDOO CHIEF STATE ATTORNEY FOR THE REPUBLIC; HAYFRON-BENJAMIN FOR THE RESPONDENT.
Other Citations:[1991] GLR 1

OFORI-BOATENG J.A.

This is an appeal by the Republic (hereinafter called the appellant) against the decision of the High Court, Kumasi, in favour of Nana Osei Kwadwo II (hereinafter called the respondent).

The facts of the case are as follows: The respondent, Nana Osei Kwadwo II, is the Omanhene of Bekwai. Under him is a village called Fahiakobo. Fahiakobo is a stool land and is controlled by an odikro or an agent of the respondent, for ruling or controlling Fahiakobo.

It is the practice in the area that the stranger farmers on the land, pay some money to the respondent and the other “odikro.” But with special regard to Fahiakobo the practice as alleged by the appellant is that, whenever any stranger farmer wants land for cultivation he has to consult the Bekwaihene, i.e. the respondent. The respondent will then refer him to the odikro of Fahiakobo, who will demarcate the land to the interested person. Any money paid in consideration of the transfer of the land is called “asikano,” and i…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.