Customer Support

REPUBLIC
V.
MAIKANKAN AND OTHERS

(1973) JELR 69154 (CA)

Court of Appeal 18 May 1973 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The admissibility of a document as evidence is challenged in a legal case. - The defense argues that the document should not be allowed because it was not listed in the summary of evidence provided to the accused. - The trial judge uphold

Case Details

Judges:KOI LARBI JSC,CHARLES CRABBE J.S.C,ANNAN J.A.
Counsel:GYEKE-DAKO DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS FOR THE REPUBLIC; PETER ADJETEY PETER SWANIKER AND JAMES QUASHIE-IDUN FOR THE RESPONDENTS.
Other Citations:[1973] 2 GLR 384

CHARLES CRABBE J.S.C.

The accused persons, ten of them, had been charged on 516 counts. The offences, alleged to have been committed between January and December 1969, range from defrauding by false pretences and uttering forged documents to forgery of documents. At the trial the prosecution sought to tender in evidence a document. Mr. Peter Swaniker, one of the defence counsel, objected to the document being tendered in evidence.

The ground for the objection was that it had not been stated in the summary of evidence of that witness that he would tender any document in evidence. Counsel contended that the object of an accused person being supplied with the summary of evidence was to enable him or his counsel to know in advance what the witness was going to do so as to avoid a surprise.

Mr. Gyeke-Dako, the Director of Public Prosecutions and prosecuting counsel, argued that all that the Criminal Procedure Code, 1960 (Act 30), required was that a summary of the witness’s evidence should be…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.