REX
V.
EDEM UDO INYANG
The appellant was convicted of murder, and sentenced to death, in the Supreme Court of the Calabar Division. His defence was insanity.
This appeal is brought on the ground of misdirection by the learned trial Judge, when summing up the evidence as to the state of the accused’s mind at the time of committing the act and coming to the conclusion that the defence of insanity had not been established as defined in section 28 of the Criminal Code. Mr. J .1. C. Taylor was assigned to argue the appeal on behalf of the appellant, and his first submission of misdirection was that the defence was one of “ partial “ insanity (by which) he meant that the appellant was subject to periods of insanity, during one of which he killed the deceased) and that the judge took the defence to be one of “total insanity” (by which Mr. Taylor meant permanent insanity).
We do not agree with this submission. It is clear that the learned Judge’s summing up of the evidence was directed to ascertaining the state of m…