Customer Support

REX
V.
ONI AND ANOR

(1949) JELR 87072 (SC)

Supreme Court 14 Dec 1949 Nigeria
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The first accused is not implicated in the act of entering or stealing, but the question is whether he can be convicted of receiving stolen property. - The stolen items, a record player and shirts, were taken from a dwelling house on Augu

Case Details

Judges:AMES, Acting S.P.J
Counsel:D. Stephen for the Crown; A.O. Lawan for accused No. 1 H.O.  Davies for Accused No. 2.
Other Citations:R v. Oni (1949) 19 NLR 61

AMES, Acting S.P.J

As to the first accused, there is insufficient evidence against him of either entering or stealing and the only question, as far as he is concerned, is whether a case of receiving has been proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The record player and shirts were in fact stolen from a dwelling house on the 21st of August, at some time before 10 am. At 3.30 pm on the 22nd the first accused and one other person, da Silva, as I will call him went together to one Major Jones of the Salvation Army, and da Silva tried to get him to buy the record payer. (The shirts, I may say here, have not been discovered). The record player was in the possession of da Silva; it was (for anything that has been proved to the contrary) da Silva who appeared to be the owner of it and it was da Silva also “who did all the taking”. What the first accused did, and he doesn’t deny it was to take da Silva to Major Jones, whom he knew and whom he had suggested to da Silva as being likely to buy it. They wen…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.