Customer Support

RIMI
V.
INEC & ANOR

(2004) JELR 45105 (CA)

Court of Appeal 6 May 2004 Nigeria
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The 2nd respondent/applicant sought an extension of time to file its brief of argument in an election appeal, as well as an order deeming the already filed brief properly filed and served. - The application was brought due to the applican

Case Details

Suit Number:CA/A/EP/19/2004(-R)
Judges:IBRAHIM TANKO MUHAMMAD Justice of The Court of Appeal of Nigeria ZAINAB ADAMU BULKACHUWA Justice of The Court of Appeal of Nigeria ALBERT GBADEBO ODUYEMI Justice of The Court of Appeal of Nigeria
Counsel:J. A. Owonikoko, Esq For Appellant S. I. Ameh, Esq. For Respondent
Other Citations:Rimi v. I.N.E.C. [2004] 15 NWLR (Pt.895)121, (2004) 15 NWLR (Pt. 895) 121

MUHAMMAD, J.C.A. (Delivering the Leading Judgment): This is a motion on notice filed by the 2nd respondent/applicant for the following reliefs:

"1. An order of enlargement of time within which the 2nd respondent/applicant may file its brief of argument in this appeal.

2. An order deeming the brief of argument already filed as being properly filed. And for such further order(s) as this Honourable Court may deem it fit to make in the circumstance of this case."

The grounds upon which the application was based are as follows:

"1. The 2nd respondent/applicant could not file its brief of argument within time limited by the Practice Direction No.1 of 2003.

2. The delay in filing the brief was not meant to show disrespect to the court.

3. The 2nd respondent/applicant has prepared and file his brief of argument."

While moving the motion, learned counsel for the 2nd respondent/applicant Mr. Owonikoko stated that the application was brought pursuant to Order 3 rule 4 of this court's rules and …

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.