Customer Support

SAAKA
V.
DAHALI

(1985) JELR 66245 (CA)

Court of Appeal 25 Jul 1985 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The Supreme Court reversed the High Court’s decision, holding that the plaintiff, as sole heir of Saaka Dagomba, retained her deceased father’s customary usufructuary interest in House No. G30, Tamale, notwithstanding subsequent statutory

Case Details

Judges:TAYLOR JSC,EDUSEI JA,EDWARD WIREDU J.A.
Counsel:MENSA-ESTI FOR THE APPELLANT ,JAMES AHENKORAH (WITH HIM BADOEHU) FOR THE RESPONDENT.

TAYLOR JSC: We have already allowed the appeal in this case, reversed the decision of the High Court and given judgment in favour of the plaintiff - appellant but we reserved our reasons for the said judgment. I now proceed to give the reasons why I concurred in the decision to allow the appeal. A brief resume of the genealogy of the litigants and the facts which have led to this dispute are very necessary to an understanding of the judgment.

The plaintiff who is the appellant before us is the daughter of one Saaka Dagomba who from the evidence must have died about 1948 or thereabout in Pong Tamale. She is his only surviving child. The mother of the defendant, the respondent herein, was one Nabia Dahali deceased, who was herself the daughter of a widow, one Napari Yemo, who also died many years ago.

The case which the plaintiff put up at the trial and which was accepted by the trial court was that her father, the late Saaka Dagomba built a house No G30 at Tamale during his lifetime and …

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.