Customer Support

SULGRAVE HOLDINGS INC.
V.
F.G.N.

(2012) JELR 57112 (SC)

Supreme Court 6 Jul 2012 Nigeria
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal against the judgment of the Court of Appeal, Abuja Division, which had upheld the Federal High Court's decision to dismiss a suit related to the recovery of over $800 million from the family of the la

Case Details

Suit Number:SC.56/2006
Judges:WALTER SAMUEL NKANU ONNOGHEN JSC CHRISTOPHER MITCHELL CHUKWUMA-ENEH JSC JOHN AFOLABI FABIYI JSC SULEIMAN GALADIMA JSC NWALI SYLVESTER NGWUTA JSC
Counsel:Abdullahi Haruna, Esq. (with him, R. O. Atabo, Esq., L. M. Aneka-Amuda (Mrs) and U. Anyebe, Esq.) - for the Appellants; T. O. Busari, Esq. (with him, Funke Yusufu (Miss)) for the Respondents.
Other Citations:(2012) 17 NWLR (Pt. 1329) 309

GALADIMA JSC (Delivering the Lead Judgment): This is an appeal against the judgment of the Court of Appeal, Abuja Division, delivered on 6 July 2005, dismissing the appellants’ appeal against the decision of the Federal High Court, Abuja, given on 8 October 2003. The trial Federal High Court had upheld the respondents’ preliminary objection and dismissed the appellants’ suit on three grounds, namely:

(a) “That the appellants’ suit was statute-barred by virtue of section 2(2)(a) of the Public Officers Protection Act, Cap. 41, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004;

(b) That the suit disclosed no reasonable cause of action; and

(c) That the trial court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the suit.”

In the appellants’ appeal to the court below, they still subjected the three grounds of the respondents’ objection to further consideration. At the end of the day, the court affirmed the decision of the trial court and dismissed the appellants’ appeal as lacking in merit. At page 655 of the rec…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.