This case is about the proper interpretation of a clause in the contract signed between the parties herein. The central issue for my determination is whether the said Clause 9.1 in the agreement bars the Defendant from engaging another entity or individual to provide the services the Plaintiff perform under the contract signed. Resolution of this issue requires determination of whether the Clause 9.1 confers exclusive right on the Plaintiff and, if so, whether same is in breach of the Public Procurement Act, 2003 (Act 663).
 The Plaintiff claims the following judicial reliefs per its writ of summons filed on December 11, 2017:
i. An order by way of specific performance of the Information Technology Services Agreement dated January 29, 2010 that the Defendant renews the Information Services Agreement in favour of Plaintiff;
ii. General Damages in addition to specific performance;
iii. An order of injunction restraining the Defendant by its office…