Customer Support

TETTEH SAMADZI
V.
THE REPUBLIC

(2017) JELR 65779 (SC)

Supreme Court 6 Apr 2017 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The appellant was convicted of two robberies and sentenced to 15 years with Hard Labour. - The convictions were based on the identification of the accused by the victims. - The trial judge did not review the evidence but only narrated the

Case Details

Suit Number:CIVIL APPEAL NO. J3/1/2016
Judges:DOTSE JSC (PRESIDING ) YEBOAH JSC, GBADEGBE JSC, BENIN JSC,PWAMANG JSC
Counsel:ALBERT ADAARE FOR THE APPELLANT/APPELLANT,ASIAMA SAMPONG (CHIEF STATE ATTORNEY) FOR THE RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT

PWAMANG, JSC:-

The conviction complained about in this appeal was in respect of two robberies at Pokuase and Ayawaso, a suburb of Pokuase, at dawn of 6th March, 2009. After a lengthy trial in which the prosecution called five witnesses and all four accused persons testified and appellant herein called five witnesses, the trial High Court, Accra on 5th December, 2013 wrote a one and half-paged judgment convicting the appellant, A2 and A4 and sentencing them to 15 years with Hard Labour. A3 was acquitted and discharged for lack of evidence. The ground for the convictions was that the accused persons were identified by the victims of the robberies and that the identifications could not be controverted. In his brief judgment the trial judge did not review the evidence led at the trial but only narrated the facts as presented by the prosecution when the accused persons were arraigned before him. Upon an appeal the Court of Appeal in its judgment dated 18th June, 2015 stated, and rightly so …

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.