Customer Support

TUKUR
V.
GOVERNMENT OF GONGOLA STATE

(1989) JELR 40508 (SC)

Supreme Court 5 Sep 1989 Nigeria
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The Supreme Court held that the Federal High Court has only limited jurisdiction as expressly conferred by the Constitution or Act of National Assembly (notably s. 7 Federal High Court Act and s. 230, 231, 237 1979 Constitution); it does

Case Details

Suit Number:SC.196/87
Judges:AUGUSTINE NNAMANI Justice of The Supreme Court of Nigeria ABDUL GANIYU OLATUNJI AGBAJE Justice of The Supreme Court of Nigeria ANDREWS OTUTU OBASEKI Justice of The Supreme Court of Nigeria ADOLPHUS GODWIN KARIBI-WHYTE Justice of The Supreme Court of Nigeria SALIHU MODIBBO ALFA BELGORE Justice of The Supreme Court of Nigeria PHILLIP NNAEMEKA-AGU Justice of The Supreme Court of Nigeria CHUKWUDIFU AKUNNE OPUTA Justice of The Supreme Court of Nigeria
Counsel:G. Brown-Peterside, S.A.N., ( with him, Chief Agboola Akomolafe and Charles Obishai) for the Appellant/Cross-Respondent For Appellant Tayo Oyetibo ( with him, Ndubuisi Agetu, E. O. Audu, Director of Civil Litigations, Gongola State Ministry of Justice) for the Respondent/Cross-Appellant For Respondent
Other Citations:(1989) A.N.L.R 575

OBASEKI, JSC (Delivering The Leading Judgment): This appeal raises the question of the extent of the jurisdiction of the Federal High Court in matters dealing with breaches and enforcement of the Fundamental Rights provisions in Chapter IV of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1979. Access to a High Court in any State in the Federation is guaranteed by section 42(1). This sub-section (1) of section 42 expressly provides that

"Any person who alleges that any of the provisions of this Chapter has been, is being or likely to be contravened in any State in relation to him may apply to a High Court in that State."

High Court is defined in section 277 of the 1979 Constitution as the Federal High Court or the High Court of a State. As sub-section (1) of section 42 of the 1979 Constitution only gives access to a High Court for relief, it is necessary to ascertain whether the Federal High Court has jurisdiction to entertain the matter which warrants the enforcement of the fu…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.