UDO
V.
C.R.S.N.C.

(2001) JELR 52496 (CA)

Court of Appeal 21 Feb 2001 Nigeria
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The appellant filed a claim against the respondents alleging bias and non-compliance with the rules of natural justice in an administrative inquiry. - The trial court dismissed the appellant's claim, but the appellant filed an appeal rais

Case Details

Suit Number:CA/C/77/99
Judges:D. ONYEJIFE EDOZIE, JCA OKWUCHUKWU OPENE, JCA SIMEON OSUJI EKPE, JCA
Counsel:Bassey F. Etuk, Esq. for the Appellant; J. E. Efa S.S.C. 1 Ministry of Justice, Calabar for the Respondents.
Other Citations:(2001) 14 NWLR (Pt. 732) 116

EDOZIE, JCA (Delivering the Lead Judgment): In suit No. C/131/85 filed at the Calabar High Court, the appellant as plaintiff claimed against the respondents as defendants reliefs adumbrated in paragraphs 15 and 16 of the 6th amended statement of claim as follows:-

“15(a) That the panel of enquiry constituted by the secretary to the Military Government and Head of the Civil Service of the Cross River State to conduct an Administrative Enquiry into the allegations of Administrative and Financial Mismanagement in the Cross River State Newspaper Corporation was incompetent to conduct such inquiry by reason of likelihood of bias on the part of the said panel against the plaintiff.

(b) That the findings and recommendations of the said panel are null and void and of no effect by reasons of the non- compliance and non-observance of the Rules of Natural Justice by the panel in the conduct of the Inquiry and/or that the panel exceed (sic) its jurisdiction in that it heard and received evidence…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 20,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.