Customer Support

UREDI
V.
DADA

(1988) JELR 42776 (SC)

Supreme Court 12 Feb 1988 Nigeria
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The plaintiff claimed N100,000 in damages for breach of an oral contract. - The plaintiff alleged that the defendants induced him to hand over N50,000 with the promise of refunding it upon completion of the contract. - The plaintiff claim

Case Details

Suit Number:SC.106/1986
Judges:AUGUSTINE NNAMANI Justice of The Supreme Court of Nigeria MUHAMMADU LAWAL UWAIS Justice of The Supreme Court of Nigeria CHUKWUDIFU AKUNNE OPUTA Justice of The Supreme Court of Nigeria ABUBAKAR BASHIR WALI Justice of The Supreme Court of Nigeria EBENEZER BABASANYA CRAIG Justice of The Supreme Court of Nigeria
Counsel:A. Akinyode Esq. For Appellant T. Onafowokan For Respondent
Other Citations:Uredi v Dada (1988) 1 NWLR (Pt.69) 237 (1988) All N.L.R 214 (1988) 2 S.C 243

CRAIG, J.S.C. (Delivering The Leading Judgment):The Plaintiff's claim in the High Court of Lagos State was as follows:

"The Plaintiff's claim against the Defendants jointly, severally or in the alternative is for sum of N100, 000.00 (One Hundred Thousand Naira) being special and general damages for breach of an oral contract when in or about January,1976 at Lagos the Defendants induced the Plaintiff to hand over to them sum of N50, 000.00 (Fifty Thousand Naira) which they promised they would refund back to him upon the completion of the contract which they claimed they were then executing at or around the Festival Village along Badagry Road which they told the Plaintiff was bringing them large amounts of profits which they promised they would share with the Plaintiff. The Defendants have since completed the contract but have only after persistent demands refunded to the Plaintiff N4, 000.00 (Four Thousand Naira) out of the said N50, 000.00 (Fifty Thousand Naira) leaving a balance of N…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.