Customer Support

WALI
V.
AMAEFULE

(2014) JELR 56746 (CA)

Court of Appeal 11 Feb 2014 Nigeria
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The appeal arose from the Federal High Court’s interlocutory order restraining appellants from collecting increased Bar Practicing Fees from Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) members, pending resolution of the respondents’ substantive challe

Case Details

Suit Number:CA/L/899/2013
Judges:CHUKWUDUMEBI SAMUEL OSEJI JCA TIJJANI ABUBAKAR JCA
Counsel:Mr. T. Oyetibo, (SAN) (with him, Messrs O. Obele, O. Adepoju and D -*- M. Akerele) - for the Appellant. -*- Mr. T. Gomez (with him, Messrs C. Nduka, A. Eyarhon) - for the 1st - 5th Respondents. -*- Mr. S. P. Onu - for the 6th Respondent. -*- Mr. A. A. Adewale - for the 7th Respondent. E

IKYEGH JCA (Delivering the Lead Judgment): The interlocutory appeal is from a ruling delivered by the Federal High Court sitting in Lagos (the court below) by which it granted an order of temporary injunction, restraining the appellants from collecting the increased Bar Practicing Fees (practicing fees) from practicing members of the legal profession of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), pending the determination of the substantive suit filed at the court below by the respondents against the appellants challenging the legality of the increased practicing fees. In outline, the 4th appellant in consultation with the 2nd appellantthrough the 1st and 3rd appellants effected an increment in the practicing fees. The increment appeared to have been done under the statutory powers of the 4th appellant stipulated by section 8 of the Legal Practitioners Act Cap. L11, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004 (L.P.A).

The respondent, on the other hand, asserted that the 3rd appellant who has no …

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.