Customer Support

YARTEY AND OKO
V.
CONSTRUCTION AND FURNITURE (WEST AFRICA) LTD.

(1962) JELR 67779 (SC)

Supreme Court 19 Feb 1962 Ghana
BriefBot icon

BriefBot Summary

Free

- The main issues in the case were: 1. Whether the appellants had the right to sue in the representative capacity in which they sued. 2. Whether the first respondents' entry on a portion of the land was unlawful and if they did the acts

Case Details

Judges:VAN LARE JSC, ADUMUA-BOSSMAN JSC, CRABBE J.S.C.
Counsel:E. AKUFO-ADDO FOR THE APPELLANTS; H. V. FRANKLIN WITH HIM E. N. P. SOWAH FOR THE FIRST RESPONDENTS., KOI LARBI FOR THE SECOND AND THIRD RESPONDENTS.

ADUMUA-BOSSMAN J.S.C.

From the pleadings there emerged as the main issues between the appellants and the first and second respondents (the original defendants and the registered trustees) the following:

(1) Whether the appellants were entitled, or had any right to sue in the representative capacity in which they sued;

(2) whether the first respondents’ admitted entry on a portion of the land was or was not unlawful; and whether in making entry they did the acts complained of in paragraph 5 of the statement of claim, namely, laid waste farms;

(3) Whether or not the appellants had usufructuary rights over the land according to native customary law, and whether, if they had, any alientation without their consent was not void.

As between the appellants and the third respondent, i.e. the Onamrokor Adain family the main issue was whether the third respondent was entitled or not to grant to the first respondents the right of ingress and egress along the narrow strip of land used as a road across…

There's more. Sign in to continue reading.

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 77,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.